Comments
Will
09/06/2009 18:10:37
Two thoughts:
1) It seems that the primary purpose of haircovering for married women is as a marker of being married; mahalokot over how much hair can be revealed seem to be about issues of the extent to which marriage is/ought be experienced as ownership of sexual rights.
2) Even where a distinction is made between married and unmarried women, it would pay to examine the issue of marriage age in the different cultures -- if it turns out that women married as they reached sexual maturity, then even arguments about hair covering as modesty are really about hair covering as marking sexually mature women who are (or ought to be, or soon will be) married as sexually unavailable. The prohibition of praying in front of such women, then, would be the result of experiencing sexually mature unmarried women as erotic.